13 January 2010

the philosophy of urban warfare

The maneuver conducted by units of the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) in Nablus in April 2002 was described by its commander, Brigadier General Aviv Kokhavi, as inverse geometry, the reorganization of the urban syntax by means of a series of microtactical actions. During the battle, soldiers moved within the city across hundred-meter-long “over- ground-tunnels” carved through a dense and contiguous urban fabric. Although several thousand soldiers and several hundred Palestinian guerrilla fighters were maneuvering simultaneously in the city, they were so “saturated” within its fabric that very few would have been visible from an aerial perspective at any given moment. Furthermore, soldiers
used none of the streets, roads, alleys, or courtyards that con-stitute the syntax of the city, and none of the external doors, internal stairwells, and windows that constitute the order of buildings, but rather moved horizontally through party walls, and vertically through holes blasted in ceilings and floors.

"This space that you look at, this room that you look at, is nothing but your interpretation of it. Now, you can stretch the boundaries of your interpretation, but not in an unlimited fashion, after all, it must be bound by physics, as it contains buildings and alleys. The question is, how do you interpret the alley? Do you interpret the alley as a place, like every architect and every town planner does,
to walk through, or do you interpret the alley as a place forbidden to walk through? This depends only on interpretation. We inter- preted the alley as a place forbidden to walk through, and the door as a place forbidden to pass through, and the window as a place forbidden to look through, because a weapon awaits us in the alley, and a booby trap awaits us behind the doors. This is because the enemy interprets space in a traditional, classical manner, and I do not want to obey this interpretation and fall into his traps. Not only do I not want to fall into his traps, I want to surprise him! This is the essence of war. I need to win. I need to emerge from an unexpected place. And this is what we tried to do.[...] I said to my troops, “Friends! This is not a matter of your choice! There is no other way of moving! If until now you were used to moving along roads and sidewalks, forget it! From now on we all walk through walls!”"

Brigadier General Aviv Kokhavi, commander of the Paratrooper Brigade of the Israeli Defense Forces. [In order to put this interview in context, it is important to note that Kokhavi took time off from active service, like many career officers, to earn a university degree. He originally intended to study architecture, but ultimately pursued philosophy]

22 comments:

Victor Plastic said...

trvly l33t

Immortal Ping said...

soldati citind Debord si Deleuze. talking about brain power, eh?

Strangelove said...

si totusi razboaiele moderne nu par deloc eficiente. Irak e un dezastru (ca numar de americani morti din cauza razboiului) poate chiar mai mare decat Vietnam-ul.

Strangelove said...

revin, numarul americanilor morti in vietnam e mai mare decat cel din iraq.

totusi:
http://www.seattlepi.com/local/255812_gulfvets16.html

Immortal Ping said...

edsti off topic si e pacat, pt ca topicul de fata e foarte ofertant

Strangelove said...

IDF a folosit un truc foarte ingenios, n-am negat asta. dar n-o sa-i ajute sa castige razboiul.

si de fapt asta e tot ce conteaza, nu?

Immortal Ping said...

ma rog, asta nu e un razboi per se. IDF are ca rol apararea israelului, nu distrugerea palestinei.
ce mi s-a parut mie tare e multidisciplinaritatea educatiei unui ofiter israelian. i mean come on, e cu totul altceva sa lupti impotriva unui om atat de cultivat si mi se pare ca spune foarte mult despre cat de mult tin israelienii la educatie si self improvement.

Immortal Ping said...

ma intreb cum s-ar desfasura luptele in afganistan daca IDS ar fi in charge

Strangelove said...

mie mi se pare mai degraba impresionanta prezentarea. daca vedeai chestia asta intr-un film ti s-ar fi parut banala :).

dj plan b said...

sa mai adaugam o dimensiune discutiei:

Astea-s doar ce-au facut ei public.
Eu as vrea sa stiu ce fac in secret.
tantanis

Strangelove said...

tocmai asta e jmekeria, ca nu mai trebuie sa faca nimic in secret, imaginarul public functioneaza de minune.

psalmplasma said...

era sa zic "ca'n the men who stare at goats", da' l'am vazut aseara si e meh.

Immortal Ping said...

just saw it. mdea, meh

K said...

o_O
ca sa nu fie doar 13 comentarii

Lheea said...

vreti sa ziceti ca nu e bun the men who stare at goatse??????
OMG MY LIFE IS OVER!
n-o sa-l vad, asta e clar

Immortal Ping said...

practic in trailer sunt toate glumele bune. mai e una cu "It's time for America, as a superpower, to grow some real superpowers"

Immortal Ping said...

o_O

ca sa nu fie 16 comentarii decat

Lheea said...

mi se pare ca toate filmele au inceput sa sufere de STE (sindromul trailerului exhaustiv) si deja imi vine sa nu ma mai uit la ele pentru ca altfel sa imi stea in gat diluantul din restul de 118 minute pe care mi-l vind marile studiouri.
spuneti un NU hotarat diluantilor!

unless it's actually poppers

Lheea said...

+risc

Immortal Ping said...

la fel de deranjant e STM (sindromul trailerului mincinos/misleading)

poate trece cu poppers?

Lheea said...

traileru prin natura lui e misleading.
toate Marile Trailere care sunt listate in Enciclopedia Marilor Trailere iti sugereaza o anumita dinamica a actiunii tocmai pentru ca la fata locului (adica la fata filmului) sa ai revelatia ca de fapt nu el o iubea pe ea cum pare-n film ci ea il iubea pe el si el era gay (si nu o bicicleta ci un scuter ci nu s-a furat ci s-a gasit).

poppersu bun trece primejdia grea.

Immortal Ping said...

un fost amic de al meu spunea ca iarba buna trece primejdia rea. spun fost amic pentru ca e impreuna cu o fosta prietena.

off topic day today